Unveiling the Veiled Women: Secondary Female Characters in Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17398/2660-7301.49.151

Keywords:

Shaw, Pygmalion, Feminism, Gender roles, Secondary characters

Abstract

George Bernard Shaw was an early and vigorous exponent of gender equality. Scholarly studies focusing on Shaw’s literary characters reach contradictory results: some argue that the author created a new model of women—domineering, clever and sensible—while others claim that his progressive ideas on women are not evident in his literary works. Pygmalion has attracted academic attention in relation to Eliza, who has been largely examined from a feminist angle, but little or no research has been done regarding secondary characters. This article argues that Shaw’s feminism should be understood through a broader gender spectrum, focusing on how secondary characters embody or challenge social expectations of femininity. Considering how Miss and Mrs Eynsford Hill, Mrs Pearce, and Mrs Higgins reproduce or subvert social norms may demonstrate that Shaw’s feminism cannot be solely explained through Eliza. The role of Freddy will also be discussed as part of Shaw’s critique of dominant masculinity, contributing to a redefinition of the boundaries of gender equality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADAMS, Elsie (1974): «Feminism and Female Stereotypes in Shaw». The Shaw Review, 17.1, 17-22.

BARKER, Judith C. (2009): «Between Humans and Ghosts: The Decrepit Elderly in a Polynesian Society». In Sokolovsky, Jay (ed.): The Cultural Context of Aging. Westport, CT: Praeger, 606-621.

BEALS, Polly (1989): Fabian Feminism: Gender, Politics and Culture in London, 1880-1930. Doctoral dissertation. New Jersey: Rutgers University.

BELLOW WATSON, Barbara (1972 [1964]): A Shavian Guide to the Intelligent Woman. New York: The Norton Library.

BERST, Charles A. (1973): Bernard Shaw and the Art of Drama. Urbana: University of Illinois.

BUCKLEY, Jennifer (2015): «Talking Machines: Shaw, Phonography, and Pygmalion». SHAW: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 35.1, 21-45: https://doi.org/10.5325/shaw.35.1.0021.

CHEN, Lihua (2006): «A feminist perspective to Pygmalion». Canadian Social Science, 2.2, 41-44.

CONNELL, Raewyn W. (1995): Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

CONNELL, Raewyn W. & MESSERSCHMIDT, James W. (2005): «Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept». Gender and Society, 19.6, 829-859.

CRENSHAW, Kimberlé (1989): «Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics». University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1, 139-167: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8.

CUMMINGS, Kathleen S. (2009): New Women of the Old Faith: Gender and American Catholicism in the Progressive Era. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

DICKERSON, Vanessa (1995): Keeping the Victorian House: A Collection of Essays. London: Routledge.

DOLGIN, Ellen Ecker (2017): «Ruled by Autonomy: Women’s Evolving Marital Choices from The Doctor’s Dilemma (1906) to Pygmalion (1914)». In Gaines, Robert A. (ed.): Bernard Shaw's Marriages and Misalliances. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 125-142.

FREUD, Sigmund (2010[1899]): The Interpretation of Dreams. New York: Perseus Books.

GIBBS, Anthony Matthews (2006): Bernard Shaw: A Life. Gainesville: University of Florida.

GILMORE, David (1990): Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity. Yale: YUP.

GRAND, Sarah (1894): «The New Aspect of the Woman Question». The North American Review, Mar., 270-276: https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813544946-003.

GREINER, Norbert (1975): «Mill, Marx and Bebel: Early Influences on Shaw’s Characterization of Women». The Shaw Review, 18.1, 10-17.

HADFIELD, Dorothy & REYNOLDS, Jean (eds.) (2013): Shaw and Feminisms: On Stage and Off. Florida: UPF, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvx06wr9.

HAMILTON, Cicely (1909): Marriage as a Trade. London: Chapman and Hall.

HOLROYD, Michael (1990): Bernard Shaw: Volume 1. 1856-1898: The Search for Love. London: Penguin.

INNES, Christopher (ed.) (1998): The Cambridge Companion to George Bernard Shaw. Cambridge: CUP.

KERN, Catherina (2007): Changing Gender Roles and the Pygmalion Motif – Shaw’s Pygmalion and the Musical My Fair Lady in their Contexts. Bachelor Thesis. Bayreuth: Universität.

LEVENSON, Ellie; LODGE, Guy & ROSEN, Greg (eds.) (2004): Fabian Thinkers: 120 Years of Progressive Thought. London: Fabian Society.

LI, Haiyan & WENG, Rongqian (2016): «Eliza’s awakening in Pygmalion». Higher Education of Social Science, 11.3, 42-48: https://doi.org/10.3968/8970.

MANGUM, Teresa (1999): «Growing Old». In Tucker, Herbert F. (ed.): A Companion to Victorian Literature and Culture. Malden: Blackwell, 97-112.

MARTIN, Sara (2001): «Resistance and Persistence: Pygmalion and My Fair Lady, Two Film Versions of G. B. Shaw’s Pygmalion». EnterText, 1.2, 37-60.

MAY, Keith (1985): Ibsen and Shaw. New York: Macmillan.

MCNAMARA, Audrey (2023): «The Wild West Meets the West End: The Shewing-Up of Blanco Posnet and Pygmalion». In Bernard Shaw: Reimagining Women and Ireland, 1892-1914. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 117-151.

MILL, John Stuart (1869): The Subjection of Women. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.

MORGAN, Margery M. (1972): The Shavian Playground: An Exploration of the Art of George Bernard Shaw. London: Methuen.

MUGGLESTONE, Lynda (1993): «Shaw, Subjective Inequality, and the Social Meanings of Language in Pygmalion». The Review of English Studies, 44.175, 373-385: https://www.jstor.org/stable/517281.

PETERS, Sally (1996): Bernard Shaw: The Ascent of the Superman. New Haven: Yale UP.

PETERS, Sally (1998): «Shaw’s life: a feminist in spite of himself». In Innes (1998: 3-24).

POWELL, Kerry (1998): «New Women, new plays, and Shaw in the 1890s». In Innes (1998: 76-100).

REYNOLDS, Jean (2022): Language and Metadrama in Major Barbara and Pygmalion: Shavian Sisters. Cham: Springer.

SHAW, Bernard (1891): The Quintessence of Ibsenism. London: Walter Scott.

SHAW, Bernard (1960): «The Author’s Apology». In Plays. London: Penguin, 65-81.

SHAW, Bernard (1975): «Pygmalion». In The Bodley Head Bernard Shaw: Collected plays with their prefaces. Ed. Dan H. Laurence. London: Bodley Head, vol. IV, 653-823.

SHAW, Bernard (1985): Collected Letters, 1911-1925. Ed. Dan H. Laurence. London: Max Reinhardt.

SHOWALTER, Elaine (1992): Sexual Anarchy: Gender and Culture at the Fin de Siècle. London: Virago.

STARKS, Lisa (1997): «Educating Eliza: Fashioning the Model Woman in the “Pygmalion Film”». Post Script, 16.2, 44-55.

WARD, Alfred Charles (ed.) (1975): Longman Companion to Twentieth Century Literature. London: Longman (2nd ed.).

WEINTRAUB, Rodelle (1977): Fabian Feminist: Bernard Shaw and Woman. Pennsylvania: PSU.

WOLLSTONECRAFT, Mary (1792): A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. London: J. Johnson.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07

How to Cite

Gort Paniello, Marta. 2026. “Unveiling the Veiled Women: Secondary Female Characters in Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw”. Anuario De Estudios Filológicos 49 (May): 151-72. https://doi.org/10.17398/2660-7301.49.151.