Theory and Practice of Friendship: avantla- lettre Populist Resemantization in «The Devoted Friend», by Oscar Wilde

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17398/2660-7301.43.289

Keywords:

Oscar Wilde, «The Devoted Friend», Hegemony, Populism, Pragmatics, Resignification

Abstract

The present article posits a re-reading of the fairy tale «The Devoted Friend» (Oscar Wilde, 1888) as a critique avant-la-lettre of populist discourses of hegemony. After a theoretical definition of the principles that constitute the populist discourse, the article conflates pragmatic and semantic discourse strategies to construe meaning in the story in search of these principles. The article discusses ideas such as the dialectical opposition between friend and foe, the hegemonic construction of the collective identity «us» vs. «them» and the vertical political structure these atrategies, more often than not, spawn. Ultimately, the article assesses the value of the story as a critical «blueprint» to debunk the social construction of the self in present contexts.

https://doi.org/10.17398/2660-7301.43.289

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BROWN, P. y LEVINSON, S. (1978): «Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena». En Goody, E.N. (ed.): Question and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge, CUP, págs. 56-289.
BUTLER, J. (1997): Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. Nueva York, Routledge.
DANSON, L. (1997): «Wilde as critic and theorist». En: Raby (1997: 80-96).
DELEUZE, G. (2002): Nietzsche y la filosofía. 6ª ed. Barcelona, Anagrama.
ELLMANN, R. (2013): Oscar Wilde. 4ª ed. Londres, Penguin.
FINCHELSTEIN, F. (2017): From Fascism to Populism in History. Oakland: University of California Press.
GAGNIER, R. (1997): «Wilde and the Victorians». En: Raby (1997: 18-31).
LACLAU, E. y MOUFFE, C. (2014): Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Londres-Nueva York, Verso [1985].
MARSH, S. (2008): «Twice Upon a Time: The Importance of Rereading “The Devoted Friend”». Children’s Literature, 36, págs. 72-87.
MARTIN, R.K. (1979): «Oscar Wilde and the Fairy Tale: ‘The Happy Prince’ as Self- Dramatization». Studies in Short Fiction, 16, págs. 74–77.
MCCORMACK, J. (1997): «Wilde’s Fiction(s)». En: Raby (1997: 96-116).
NIETZSCHE, F. (2016): «La genealogía de la moral» y «El Anticristo». En Sánchez Meca, D. (ed.): Obras completas: obras de madurez II, vol. 4.4. Madrid, Tecnos, págs. 342-500 y 698-803.
RABY, P. (ed.) (1997): The Cambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde. Cambridge, CUP.
SCHMIDGALL, G. (1994): The Stranger Wilde: Interpreting Oscar Wilde. Londres, Abacus.
SCHMITT, C. (2005): El concepto de lo político. Madrid, Alianza.
TAGGART. P. (2019): «Populism and ‘unpolitics’». En Fitzi, G. et al. (eds.): Populism and the Crisis of Democracy. Vol. I: Concepts and Theory. Nueva York, Routledge, págs. 79-87.
URBINATI, N. (2014): Democracy Disfigured. Opinion, Truth and the People. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
VALLS OYARZUN, E. (2017): Dueños del tiempo y del espanto. Madrid, Escolar y Mayo.
WILDE, O. (1986): De Profundis. Londres, Penguin, 1986.
—— (1994a): «The Devoted Friend». Complete Short Fiction. Londres, Penguin.
—— (1994b): «The Soul of Man under Socialism». The Soul of Man under Socialism and Selected Critical Prose. London, Penguin, págs. 125-160.
WOOD, N. (2002): «Creating the Sensual Child: Paterian Aesthetics, Pederasty, and Oscar Wilde's Fairy Tales». Marvels & Tales, 16.2, págs. 156-170.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-02

How to Cite

Valls Oyarzun, Eduardo. 2020. “Theory and Practice of Friendship: Avantla- Lettre Populist Resemantization in «The Devoted Friend», by Oscar Wilde”. Anuario De Estudios Filológicos 43 (October): 289-308. https://doi.org/10.17398/2660-7301.43.289.