New insights into literary topoi: a study of 'madness for guilt and remorse’

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17398/2660-7301.45.193

Keywords:

topoi, madness for guilt, classical reception, classical literature

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to offer a new perspective towards the literary topoi, both in theory and practice, by elaborating on the definition of topos, as well as its similarities and differences from other literary concepts, such as motif, leitmotiv, or theme. By focusing on the topos of ‘madness for guilt and remorse’, we intend to apply our theoretical proposal to a close reading of literary texts. The evolution of this topos from Classical tradition to modern American drama will also be traced. The following texts will be examined: Euripides’s Orestes (408 BC), Vergil’s Aeneid (29-19 BC), Shakespeare’s Macbeth (1606), Nathaniel Hawthorne’s «Roger Malvin’s Burial» (1832) and Eugene O’Neill’s Mourning Becomes Electra (1931). It is argued that the presence of this topos in the aforementioned works follows in the footsteps of Euripides’s retelling of the myth of Orestes. The results of the study testify to the creative recurrence of this topos in Western literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Zahra Nazemi, Razi University (Iran) and Universidad de Cordoba

    Zahra Nazemi is a joint PhD candidate of English Literature and Language at Razi University (Kermanshah, Iran) and the University of Cordoba (Spain). Her fields of interest are comparative literature and modern American drama. She has published several articles in international journals.

  • Nasser Maleki, Razi University (Kermanshah, Iran)

    Nasser Maleki is an associate professor of English Literature at Razi University (Kermanshah, Iran). He has taught different courses of English literature for over 25 years, supervised many Master and PhD theses in this field and published numerous articles in international prestigious journals.

  • Gabriel Laguna Mariscal, Universidad de Cordoba

    Gabriel Laguna Mariscal is a professor of Latin Philology at the university of Cordoba. He has been a visiting scholar in Cornell, Harvard and Indiana universities, and a professor at the universities of Extremadura and Córdoba. His main fields of research are Classical Latin literature, Topicology and Classical reception. He has published several books and numerous articles in these areas.

References

ABRAMS, M. H. and HARPHAM, G. G. (2015): A Glossary of Literary Terms. Stamford: Cengage Learning.

ADEN, L. H. (2012): Guilt and the Search for Fulfillment. Eugene: Cascade Books.

AGUIAR E SILVA, V. M. de (1972): Teoría de la literatura. Madrid: Gredos.

ALEXANDER, D. (2007): »Mourning Becomes Electra«. In Bloom, H. (ed.): Bloom’s Modern Critical Views: Eugene O’Neill. New York: Bloom’s Literary Criticism, 31-58.

BALDICK, C. (2001): The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. New York: OUP.

BOGARD, T. (1988): Contour in Time: The Plays of Eugene O'Neill. New York: OUP.

BURIAN, P. (1997): «Tragedy adapted for stages and screens: The Renaissance to the present». In Easterling, P. E. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. Cambridge: CUP, 228-283.

CHILDS, P. and FOWLER, R. (2006): The Routledge Dictionary of Literary Terms. London-New York: Routledge.

CUDDON, J. A. (1999): The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. London: Penguin Books.

CURTIUS, E. R. (1983): European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Tr. W. R. Trask. Princeton-Oxford: PUP.

EIGEN, M. (2005): Emotional Storm. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

ERLICH, G. C. (1972): «Guilt and Expiation in “Roger Malvin's Burial”». Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 26.4, 377-389.

ESCOBAR, Á. (2000): «Hacia una definición lingüística del tópico literario». Myrtia, 15, 123-160.

FARRON, S. (1993): Vergil's Aeneid: A Poem of Grief and Love. Leiden-New York-Koln: Brill.

FEDER, L. (1980): Madness in Literature. Princeton: PUP.

FISCHER-LICHTE, E. (2004): History of European Drama and Theatre. London-New York: Routledge.

GOMEZ LUQUE, J. A. (2018): El tópico literario de la travesía de amor: de la literatura clásica a la poesía española de los Siglos de Oro. PhD thesis, Universidad de Córdoba.

HAMILTON, E. (1942): Mythology. New York: Back Bay Books.

HOBGOOD, A. P. (2013): »Feeling Fear in Macbeth«. In Craik, K. A. and Pollard, T. (eds.): Shakespearean Sensations: Experiencing Literature in Early Modern England. New York: CUP.

HOOTI, N. and FAKHRI, R. (2011): »The Nature of Guilt in Eugene O’Neill’s Mourning Becomes Electra«. Studies in Literature and Language, 3.2, 19-24.

KATCHADOURIAN, H. (2010): Guilt: The Bite of Conscience. Stanford: SUP.

KHARE, R. R. (1998): Shakespeare, Eugene O'Neill, T.S. Eliot and the Greek Tragedy. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.

LAGUNA MARISCAL, G. (1999): «En tierra, en humo, en polvo, en sombra, en nada: historia de un tópico literario». Anuario de Estudios Filológicos, 22, 197-213.

LAGUNA MARISCAL, G. (2014): «Regalos para enamorar (munera amoris): un tópico literario de ayer y de hoy». In Moreno Soldevila, R. and Martos, J. (eds.): Amor y sexo en Roma: su reflejo en la literatura. Huelva: Universidad de Huelva, 25-56.

LEEMAN, A. D. (1982): «The lonely vigil. A topos in ancient literature«. In Boeft, J. den and Kessels, A. H. M. (eds.): Actus: Studies in honour of H. L. W. Nelson. Utrecht: Instituut voor Klassieke Talen, 189-201.

LÓPEZ GREGORIS, R. (2021): «Tematología». In García Jurado, F. (ed.): Diccionario Hispánico de la Tradición y Recepción Clásica. Madrid: Guillermo Escolar, 707-715.

MARCH, J. (2001): Cassell's Dictionary of Classical Mythology. London: Cassell & Co.

MÁRQUEZ, M. A. (2002): «Tema, motivo y tópico. Una propuesta terminológica«. Exemplaria, 6, 251-256.

MOSKALEW, W. (1982): Formular Language and Poetic Design in the Aeneid. Leiden: Brill.

MOST, G. W. and CONTE, G. B. (2012): »The Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford: OUP.

NUGENT, S. G. (1988): »Masking Becomes Electra: O'Neill, Freud, and the Feminine«. Comparative Drama, 22.1, 37-55.

PADEL, R. (1992): In and Out of the Mind: Greek Images of the Tragic Self. Princeton: PUP.

PADEL, R. (1995): Whom Gods Destroy: Elements of Greek and Tragic Madness. Princeton: PUP.

PRATT, N. T. (1956): »Aeschylus and O'Neill: Two Worlds«. The Classical Journal, 51.4, 163-167.

QUINN, E. (2006): A Dictionary of Literary and Thematic Terms. New York: Facts on File.

ROBINSON, J. A. (1998): »The middle plays«, in Manheim, M. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Eugene O’Neill. Cambridge: CUP, 69-81.

ROSS, D. W. (1989): »Revising a Map Misread: Hamlet, Romantic Self-Consciousness, and the Roots of Modern Tragedy«. In Dotter, R. L. (ed.): Shakespeare: Text, Subtext, and Context. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press, 107-123.

SCHEFF, T. J. (1997): Emotions, the Social Bond, and Human Reality: Part/Whole Analysis. Cambridge: CUP.

SCHIMMEL, S. (2002): Wounds Not Healed by Time: The Power of Repentance and Forgiveness. New York: OUP.

SLOTKIN, R. (1973): Regeneration Through Violence: The Mythology of the American Frontier, 1600-1860. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

TEUBERT, W. (2004): »When Did We Start Feeling Guilty?». In Weigand, E. (ed.): Emotion in Dialogic Interaction: Advances in the Complex. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 121-162.

THEODOROU, Z. (1993): »Subject to Emotion: Exploring Madness in Orestes«. The Classical Quarterly New Series, 43.1, 32-46.

WILLINK, C. W. (1986): Euripides: Orestes. Oxford: OCP.

WRIGHT, M. (2008): Euripides: Orestes. London-New York: Bloomsbury.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-04

How to Cite

Nazemi, Zahra, Nasser Maleki, and Gabriel Laguna Mariscal. 2022. “New Insights into Literary Topoi: A Study of ’madness for Guilt and remorse’”. Anuario De Estudios Filológicos 45 (July): 193-210. https://doi.org/10.17398/2660-7301.45.193.